Subject: The common knowledge of Kings, Priests, and WHIPs Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:36:44 -0500 From: wesburt@juno.com Reply-To: cyber-soc@topica.com To: Discussion@globaljusticemovement.net, humanist@topica.com, mai-not@globalproblematique.net, simpol-USA@yahoogroups.com Good day folks, As you surly know by now, the technical content of my writing and of the several visual-aids hosted on W. Curtiss Priest's web site below have been the common knowledge of Kings, Priests, and WHIPs (the wealthy, healthy, intelligent, and powerful folks) since the beginning of recorded history. Not too long ago, anyone who made a public disclosure of this material would have been cured of his heresy by the Inquisition. Lucky for us, the Church Of Rome has recently changed its instruments of instruction from the stake and the rack to a series of Encyclical Letters on principles of economics and the necessity of a "Family Wage" to secure the full benefits of a free market economy. The Euro Nations and Japan adopted this "new paradigm" after World War II and enjoyed three decades, or more, of full employment, economic stability, and no inflation, except for that generated by expansion of the US money supply from 1969 to date. But the "new paradigm," while Standard Operating Practice (SOP) in the US private sector since the 1890s and adopted by Europe and Asia in the 1940s, has not been applied to the public sector in the UK or the USA. Since the founding of the American Economic Association in 1885, those American heretics who presumed to extend the SOP of the US private sector to the US public sector have been cursed as socialists, cursed as "traitors to their class," and given a stiff dose of unemployment to cure their heresy. So now we have only the Jews, the Muslims, the American Protestants, the Humanists, and the Atheists still enforcing the "Christian Principle Of Subsidiarity" on their congregations while the Church of Rome now teaches the principle of a "Family Wage," every where except in the USA. Did anyone ever hear Daniel Patrick Moynihan speak in favor of Catholic social teaching? So what, exactly, is the technical content of the several visual-aids hosted on W. Curtiss Priest's web site below? The several visual-aids simply expand the content of Adam Smith's First Maxim of Taxation which equates; the expense of government for the citizens of a great nation, to, the expense of management for the joint tenants of a great estate or corporation. (T. W. O. N., 1776, Pg. 777) This First Maxim declares that corporations and governments should perform the same service for their respective kind of reproducible productive assets, people and product lines. That is, to distribute the nonrecurring expense of developing the next generation of productive assets over the income, or value-added by those assets currently in production, as shown on attached file Fig7e.gif. This method of funding works as well for developing infrastructure as it does for developing capital or human productive assets, and the funding is "interest free," "debt free," and "inflation free." This visual-aid was originally part of Fig7-9.gif, "The Whole Divine Law," that identified the Three Mosaic Tithes as the necessary supplement to the Ten Commandments. Without the religious references, Fig7e.gif invites attention to the biological necessity of a sustaining feedback of current output, from those who produced the wealth to those in the development stage of their life cycle, who have produced nothing to date. It is obvious that those in development are powerless to enforce a level of feedback which will assure their full development. So social development is always, and only, at the pleasure of those in production, who constitute the majority of taxpayers and voters in every village, town, city, state, or nation. Parents seldom fail to assume burden when public funding is deficient, and thereby leave the lower half of the work force with a shortage of purchasing power, while Warren Buffett's upper half enjoy a 3-5% reduction of their income tax rate. Those who teach that taxes are evil, and should be evaded, are destroyers of civilizations! Count them on your fingers; Biblical Israel, Classical Greece, Imperial Rome, Islam, Spain, British Empire, the "New World Order." We know from the 200 year profile of the US CPI that US public policy funds only the 1-12 public education half of the development expense of our human productive assets. The other half; higher education, health care, and subsistence, fall on the parenting family when their earning ability is low. Our corporations, on the other hand, the ten I worked for plus Wal-Mart, all use a flat 30% G&A (general and administrative) rate applied to all sales revenue. The most successful corporations spend the full 10% of sales on capital development, and so, have become the dominant species of our times. The question is: would the restoration of the "new paradigm" in the USA, following the example of Europe and Asia, be a monetary reform or a moral reform? All of the popular and well funded movements on the Internet are searching for monetary reforms. I am inclined to agree with C. H. Douglas that we need moral reform. Thanks to Bill Ryan for his note below: From: william_b_ryan@yahoo.com To: socialcredit@elistas.com Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:40:27 -0800 (PST) Subject: [socialcredit] "pound for pound" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Begin letter ~~~~~~~~ 13th April, 1933 Dear Mr. Byrne, In reference to our conversation yesterday afternoon, ~~~~ discussion of proposed monitary reform ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ (snipped by Wes Burt) ~~~~~~~~~~~~ As you know, I consider the administration of the present banks admirable, and I think to put forward a proposal of this kind is either to court the accusation that it is not understood by its sponsors, or else to raise up a wholly unnecessary and additional antagonism on the part of orthodox bankers. Yours sincerely, C. H. Douglas ~~~~~ End letter ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Of course, I don't know if that letter was composed by Douglas, Ryan, or some other social crediter, but I agree with it and the construction of the money supply data on the visual-aids on Curtiss' web site below shows that our monetary system does just what it is supposed to do! Kind regards, Wes Burt The Optimum Policy (TOP) is shown at To join the discussion, just subscribe to any one of the lists which distribute my posts.